A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between possible neighbours above the development of the wall in a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, search for to develop their relatives property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted less than setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their setting up permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a delicate coastal surroundings for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially constructed, is in the right situation. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-substantial water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to gather Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Times described, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the water for the duration of serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became One of the more hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second inside the authorized timeline.
With the core from the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as manufactured, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of arranging files, maps, and situations hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their action is motivated by problem for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving a private view, insisting in its place that it is about guaranteeing that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they have got explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply attempting to make a household home in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work happen to be carried out based upon Experienced guidance and accredited designs. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how preparing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description to get a circumstance that a lot of observers see as more and more frequent. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation amongst personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become far more contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from very unique Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily truth of the coastline and also the symbolic character on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much solution.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court docket must determine whether the wall as built complies with preparing authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging problems. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay alongside one another very long following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the situation prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when basic difficulties including environmental defense and property rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to One of the more intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.